What our clients say first

We asked Stellar AI Journey to reduce manual invoice processing. Within six weeks they had a working classifier that cut our back-office hours by roughly 40%. The model runs on our own servers — no ongoing cloud bill surprises. — Finance director, mid-size logistics company, Leeds
Their team spent two days just listening before they proposed anything. The recommendation engine they built for our e-commerce catalogue increased average basket value by £8.50 per order in the first quarter. — Head of digital, Yorkshire retail brand

How we bring Artificial Intelligence to your organisation

Most AI projects fail because someone skips straight to the model. We follow a different sequence. Below is the actual path a typical engagement takes, from the first conversation to a system your team uses every day.

Week 0

Listening session

We sit with the people who do the work. Not the board deck — the actual workflow. A warehouse picker, a claims handler, a customer-service agent. We record where time drains away and where decisions get stuck. This session is free and takes half a day.

Week 1–2

Data audit

Your data is probably messier than you think. We map every source — spreadsheets, CRM exports, sensor logs, email threads — and score each one for completeness, freshness and bias. The output is a short, honest report: what is usable today, what needs cleaning, and what is missing entirely.

Week 3–4

Feasibility model

Before committing budget to a full build, we train a lightweight prototype on a sample of your data. If the numbers look promising, we continue. If they don't, we tell you. Two of our last nine feasibility studies ended with a recommendation not to proceed — and that saved those clients tens of thousands of pounds.

Week 5–8

Build and iterate

Our engineers develop the production model in fortnightly sprints. Each sprint ends with a demo your team can test. We use open-source frameworks wherever possible so you are never locked into a proprietary stack. Typical models include document classifiers, demand forecasters, anomaly detectors and recommendation engines.

Week 9–10

Integration and handover

The model connects to your existing systems through APIs or batch pipelines. We write the documentation, train your team, and run the system in shadow mode alongside your current process for at least a week before switching over. You own the code and the model weights outright.

Ongoing

Monitoring retainer

Models drift as the world changes. We offer a lightweight monthly retainer that includes performance monitoring, retraining triggers and quarterly review calls. About half our clients take this up; the rest manage monitoring in-house with the dashboards we leave behind.

Capability map

We don't sell a single product. We match the right technique to your problem. Here is what we actually build.

Technique Typical use Data you need Timeline
Document classification Sorting invoices, contracts, support tickets A few thousand labelled examples 4–6 weeks
Demand forecasting Stock planning, staffing rotas, capacity 18+ months of transaction history 5–7 weeks
Anomaly detection Fraud alerts, equipment failure, quality control Sensor or transaction logs with timestamps 3–5 weeks
Recommendation engines Product suggestions, content personalisation User interaction data (clicks, purchases) 6–8 weeks
Natural language processing Chatbots, sentiment analysis, summarisation Text corpus relevant to your domain 5–9 weeks
Computer vision Defect inspection, document digitisation Annotated images (we can help annotate) 6–10 weeks

A note on hype

Large language models get all the headlines. They are genuinely useful for some tasks — summarising long documents, drafting first-pass copy, answering internal knowledge-base questions. But they are expensive to run, hard to control, and sometimes confidently wrong.

For many business problems, a well-tuned classical model outperforms a general-purpose LLM at a fraction of the cost. We will always recommend the simplest approach that solves your problem. If a rules engine or a spreadsheet formula is enough, we will say so.

Who we work with

Mostly mid-size companies — 50 to 500 employees — in logistics, retail, financial services and manufacturing across the UK. We have also supported two NHS trusts with patient-flow prediction, though healthcare projects take longer because of information governance requirements.

Who we are

Seven people. Four machine-learning engineers, one data engineer, one project lead and one designer who makes dashboards people actually want to open. We are based in Leeds but work remotely with clients across England and Scotland. No offshore subcontracting.

Fit check — is AI right for your problem?

Answer these honestly before you call anyone.

Do you have data?
AI needs examples to learn from. If your process runs on phone calls and sticky notes, the first step is digitising — not modelling. We can help with that, but it adds time and cost.
Is the decision repeatable?
AI excels at decisions made hundreds or thousands of times: approve/reject, route to team A or B, flag for review. One-off strategic choices are better left to experienced humans with good data visualisations.
Can you tolerate occasional errors?
No model is 100% accurate. If a wrong prediction causes minor inconvenience (a misrouted email), AI is a good fit. If it causes serious harm (a missed cancer diagnosis), you need much higher confidence thresholds and human oversight built in.
Do you have someone internally who will own the system?
After we leave, someone on your team needs to watch the dashboards, escalate anomalies and approve retraining. This does not require a data scientist — a technically curious operations manager is usually enough.
Is your leadership patient?
A realistic AI project takes two to three months from kick-off to production. If your board expects results in two weeks, the project will be rushed and the model will underperform. We are happy to join a call with senior stakeholders to set expectations.

A recent outcome

A regional food distributor asked us to predict next-day order volumes for 1,200 product lines. Their existing method was a spreadsheet maintained by one person who had been doing it for eleven years. When that person went on leave, forecasts collapsed.

We trained a gradient-boosted model on three years of order history, weather data and promotional calendars. Forecast accuracy went from 68% to 89% measured by weighted MAPE. The spreadsheet still exists — as a fallback — but it hasn't been opened in four months.

Pricing principles

We charge for time, not for magic. Typical engagements fall into two bands:

Discovery and feasibility

£3,000 – £6,000 depending on complexity. Covers the listening session, data audit and feasibility model. You get a written report and a working prototype you can test. If you decide not to continue, you keep everything.

Full build and deployment

£12,000 – £35,000 depending on model type, data volume and integration complexity. Includes all engineering, documentation, training and two weeks of post-launch support. The monitoring retainer, if you want it, runs £800 per month.

We do not charge for the initial listening session. We also do not charge if our feasibility study concludes that AI is not the right approach for your situation.

Engineers reviewing AI model performance in our Leeds workspace

Start a conversation

Fill in the short form below or contact us directly.

[email protected]
+44 113 239 1920
39 Davis Corner, Leeds LS1 4AP, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Frequently asked

Do we need a data team before we start?
No. We work alongside whoever manages your data today, even if that person's main job is something else. We document everything so knowledge stays in your organisation.
Can you work with data stored on-premises?
Yes. About a third of our projects run entirely on the client's own infrastructure. We can also work in hybrid setups where training happens in the cloud but inference runs locally.
What happens if the model stops performing well?
Models degrade when the underlying data patterns change — new product lines, seasonal shifts, policy changes. Our monitoring dashboards flag drift automatically. If you are on the retainer, we retrain within five working days. If not, you can call us for a one-off retraining engagement.

Privacy policy

Last updated: January 2026

Stellar AI Journey collects your name, email address and any message content you submit through our contact form. We use this information solely to respond to your enquiry and, if you become a client, to manage our working relationship.

We do not sell, rent or share your personal data with third parties for marketing purposes. Data is stored on encrypted servers within the United Kingdom and retained for no longer than 24 months after our last communication unless a longer period is required by law.

We use a single cookie to remember whether you have acknowledged this notice. No tracking cookies, analytics pixels or advertising identifiers are placed by this website.

You may request access to, correction of, or deletion of your personal data at any time by emailing [email protected]. We will respond within 30 days.

Terms of service

Last updated: January 2026

By using this website you agree to these terms. The content on stellaraijourney.click is provided for general information about our services. It does not constitute a contractual offer.

Project-specific terms, deliverables, timelines and fees are defined in individual statements of work signed by both parties before any paid engagement begins.

Intellectual property in all models, code and documentation produced during an engagement transfers to the client upon full payment, unless the statement of work specifies otherwise.

We are not liable for decisions made on the basis of model outputs without appropriate human oversight. AI systems produce probabilistic predictions, not guarantees.

These terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales. Any dispute will be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

Disclaimer

Last updated: January 2026

The performance figures, timelines and cost ranges mentioned on this website are based on past projects and are provided as indicative examples. Every organisation's data, infrastructure and requirements are different, so actual outcomes may vary.

We make reasonable efforts to keep the information on this site accurate and up to date, but we do not warrant its completeness or suitability for any particular purpose.

References to specific technologies, frameworks or third-party services do not constitute endorsement. We select tools on a project-by-project basis according to technical merit and client constraints.

We use a single functional cookie to remember your consent choice. No tracking or advertising cookies. Read our privacy policy.